You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
i think the public facing group content can be viewed but a sign in would be necessary to interact
that way you can have a cta to sign up if people like what they see
alternatively, instagram's route is a truncated post forcing the viewer to download/sign up to view the post - i believe this is a dark ux route though, and dont recommend it
yeah that's true, public content would allow people to share things and could help the app catch on. Though, if we're going for a replacement for Discord, maybe public content isn't needed? Not sure.
An idea I came up with today would be to publish things through something like IPFS, which has gateways to regular HTTP. Using Hyphanet could work too, but I'm not aware of any gateways for this.
That way you could, as an example, link someone outside the group to upload photos to a photoboard, etc. Would still need some type of anonymity for this, see 0chroma/InductionDB#1
For more open communities I think it's good to start thinking about how new members could discover them. Some notes I have for potential solutions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: