Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Request] Support for MetadataTypeAttribute #6

Open
onodera-sf opened this issue Apr 12, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

[Request] Support for MetadataTypeAttribute #6

onodera-sf opened this issue Apr 12, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@onodera-sf
Copy link

We are using EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQL.ColumnEncryption.
I have one request.

I think that "NpgsqlEncrypt" is supposed to be added to the property to be encrypted,
When generating code with "Database first", "NpgsqlEncrypt" cannot be added because the code will be overwritten.

In ASP.NET Core, etc., there is a mechanism to artificially add attributes with "MetadataTypeAttribute" in consideration of this.
I would appreciate it if you could adopt this for EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQL.ColumnEncryption as well.

[Code example]

Auto-generated code

namespace TestPostgres.Models.Database
{
  [Table("User")]
  public partial class User
  {
    [Key]
    public int ID { get; set; }
    
    [StringLength(32)]
    public string? Name { get; set; }
  }
}

Manual add code

namespace TestPostgres.Models.Database
{
  [MetadataTypeAttribute(typeof(UserMetadata))]
  public partial class User
  {
  }

  public class UserMetadata
  {
    [NpgsqlEncrypt]
    public string? Name { get; set; }
  }
}
@AltairCA
Copy link
Owner

Got this answer by using Chat GPT, can you give it a go?

In Entity Framework Core (EF Core), the Code-First approach is more commonly used for defining the model and the database schema based on the code. However, if you are working with an existing database (i.e., a Database-First approach) and you want to use custom attributes with metadata, you can still achieve this by leveraging EF Core's Fluent API.

Here's how you can use custom attributes with metadata in a Database-First scenario in EF Core:

  1. Create Your Metadata Classes: Define your metadata classes with custom attributes. These metadata classes represent the structure and validation rules of your database entities.
public class CustomerMetadata
{
    [Required]
    public string Name { get; set; }

    [MaxLength(100)]
    public string Email { get; set; }
}
  1. Map Your Metadata with Fluent API: In your DbContext class, use the Fluent API to map your metadata to the database entities. You can configure this during the OnModelCreating method override.
protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
    modelBuilder.Entity<Customer>()
        .ForSqlServerHasAnnotation("MyCustomAttribute", "MyValue") // Example of a custom attribute
        .HasMetadata<CustomerMetadata>(metadata =>
        {
            metadata.Property(e => e.Name).HasColumnName("CustomerName");
            metadata.Property(e => e.Email).HasColumnName("EmailAddress");
        });
}

In the code above:

  • We use .ForSqlServerHasAnnotation("MyCustomAttribute", "MyValue") to add a custom attribute to the entity. You can replace "MyCustomAttribute" and "MyValue" with your desired custom attribute and value.

  • We use .HasMetadata<CustomerMetadata> to associate the CustomerMetadata class with the Customer entity.

  • Inside the metadata configuration, we use metadata.Property(...) to map the properties in the metadata class to the actual database columns. This allows you to customize the database column names and apply additional configuration if needed.

This approach allows you to maintain a separation of concerns by keeping your metadata in separate classes while using the Fluent API to map and configure your database entities when working with a Database-First approach in EF Core.

Please note that EF Core's primary approach is Code-First, where you define the model classes and let EF Core generate the database schema. The Database-First approach is less common but is still supported, and you can use the Fluent API to customize the mapping and metadata for entities in this scenario.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants