You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As AIP#61 states the Channel is defined by (leader, follower, guardian, tokenAddr, nonce)
Channel validation - is token allowed? is the requester a Leader or a Follower?
No routes for storing Channels, they are gone.
Campaign
A Campaign is defined by Campaign { id: CampaignId, channel: Channel, creator, validators, title.... rest of the ChannelSpec fields }
Note: The fields were aligned with Ivo before making the changes for the Campaign.
CampaignIdshould be a randomly assigned value by Sentry, we've chose the Uuid as a random generator in Rust and using a representation of the 16 bytes as 0x prefixed hex string
No migration
Apart from that we can remove obsolete fields in the ChannelSpec as the v5 will not have migration from v4 as it will work in a different way that v4.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The update way of use for channels does not need campaigns in the validators. Each channel will be used as ledgere between all participants. For the analytics we can use the campaignID (exteranl id generated on the backend) in tha path of the event record.
https://github.com/AdExNetwork/aips/issues/61
Rust reference:
Issue: AmbireTech/adex-validator-stack-rust#382
PRs: AmbireTech/adex-validator-stack-rust#383
Channel
As AIP#61 states the Channel is defined by
(leader, follower, guardian, tokenAddr, nonce)
Campaign
Campaign { id: CampaignId, channel: Channel, creator, validators, title.... rest of the ChannelSpec fields }
Note: The fields were aligned with Ivo before making the changes for the Campaign.
CampaignId
should be a randomly assigned value bySentry
, we've chose theUuid
as a random generator in Rust and using a representation of the 16 bytes as0x
prefixed hex stringNo migration
Apart from that we can remove obsolete fields in the
ChannelSpec
as the v5 will not have migration from v4 as it will work in a different way that v4.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: