Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider a monorepo #120

Closed
callumlocke opened this issue Oct 31, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Consider a monorepo #120

callumlocke opened this issue Oct 31, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@callumlocke
Copy link

I've just read Babel's reasons for having a monorepo (and some of the discussions linked from the bottom of that page), and it struck me that this might be a good strategy for AmpersandJS too.

If this idea has been discussed already then please close this.
@cdaringe
Copy link
Member

please ref AmpersandJS/ampersand-state#219

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@callumlocke @cdaringe