shippable doesn't pull arm64v8/centos

[hmaarrfk]

shippable_retry sudo docker pull arm64v8/centos:
invalid reference format
retrying 1 of 3 times...
invalid reference format
retrying 2 of 3 times...
invalid reference format
retrying 3 of 3 times...

Then fails

See: https://app.shippable.com/github/Archiconda/cmake-feedstock/runs/6/1/console

[hmaarrfk]

@mariusvniekerk

[junaruga]

I faced this issue too.

https://app.shippable.com/github/junaruga/ruby/runs/7/1/console

shippable_retry sudo docker pull ruby:2.5-stretch:
invalid reference format
retrying 1 of 3 times...
invalid reference format
retrying 2 of 3 times...
invalid reference format
retrying 3 of 3 times...

The ruby:2.5-stretch image has "arm64/v8" architecture.
https://hub.docker.com/_/ruby?tab=tags&page=1&name=2.5-stretch

""arm64/v8" architecture" is not like "drydock/aarch64_u16all:v7.2.4" "arm64" architecture.
https://github.com/dry-dock/aarch64_u16all
https://hub.docker.com/r/drydock/aarch64_u16all/tags
I suppose this is the reason of the issue.

[hmaarrfk]

I see. Conda forge moved to drone and azure. So I don't think this is applicable anymore.

[junaruga]

Sure, actually I started using Drone CI for my project too.

[junaruga]

Which repository are you using Drone CI on? Can I see .drone.yml or .drone.star as a reference?

[hmaarrfk]

Check numpy feedstock for conda forge

[junaruga]

Thanks. But there is no .drone.yml or .drone.star in the repository.
https://github.com/conda-forge/numpy-feedstock

[hmaarrfk]

Hmm, maybe try renrenderijg one of them. I'm thinking of looking at scioy as well, but there was some ipython one where we had to use it.

[junaruga]

Thanks. I found some .drone.yml files in conda-forge organization repositories.
https://github.com/search?q=org%3Aconda-forge+arm64&type=Code