You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
The AI does not seem to use cards like Undying Malice or Not Dead After All that give a creature "when this die this turn reanimate it" to protect creatures that would die in combat or to kill spells.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
AI has one of the affected cards in hand, mana to cast it, and a creature on board.
Threaten to destroy that creature (blocking, kill spell, board wipe)
AI does not react.
Expected behavior
AI should cast the spell on its creature so that it comes back from being destroyed.
Desktop:
OS: Windows 10
Version 2.0.00
Additional context
AI seems to have no problem doing that with indestructible pump spells (like Battle-Rage Blessing) in each of those 3 cases (blocking/blocked, targeted kill spell, board wipe).
There might be some other cases to consider, like not doing that on creatures that already have persist/undying, or doing it in response to a sacrifice so they can blank it, but at least the "pseudo indestructible" targeting would be a good enough use.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the bug
The AI does not seem to use cards like Undying Malice or Not Dead After All that give a creature "when this die this turn reanimate it" to protect creatures that would die in combat or to kill spells.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
AI should cast the spell on its creature so that it comes back from being destroyed.
Desktop:
Additional context
AI seems to have no problem doing that with indestructible pump spells (like Battle-Rage Blessing) in each of those 3 cases (blocking/blocked, targeted kill spell, board wipe).
There might be some other cases to consider, like not doing that on creatures that already have persist/undying, or doing it in response to a sacrifice so they can blank it, but at least the "pseudo indestructible" targeting would be a good enough use.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: