Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Performance mismatch #25

Open
Yzichen opened this issue Feb 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Performance mismatch #25

Yzichen opened this issue Feb 3, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Yzichen
Copy link
Contributor

Yzichen commented Feb 3, 2024

I use bs=4x8, lr=1e-4 for training and the cbgs result is:

Evaluating bboxes of pts_bbox
mAP: 0.4166
mATE: 0.5791
mASE: 0.2850
mAOE: 0.5265
mAVE: 0.2424
mAAE: 0.1887
NDS: 0.5261
Eval time: 72.3s

@Divadi
Copy link
Owner

Divadi commented Mar 7, 2024

Hmm.. I have not validated lower batch size. Prior work have shown that with lower batch size, performance may decline a bit. Perhaps you can consider tuning the learning rate a bit - I will leave this issue open so others can comment if they face similar issues.

@Mingqj
Copy link

Mingqj commented Sep 25, 2024

I also have the same issues. When I use a batch size of 32, the performance will drop about 1 pp both on NDS and mAP.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants