You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While reviewing Table 2, I noticed the notation for "SFT w/ Complex CoT (x̂, ŷ)". However, based on the context and the explanation in the paper, it seems that (x̂, ŷ) might actually refer to (ê, ŷ).
Could you please clarify if this is a typographical error or if I am misunderstanding the notation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is not a typographical error. "ê" represents the model’s internal reasoning, while "ŷ" is the complete answer based on that reasoning. The pair (ê, ŷ) is somewhat analogous to OpenAI-o1's hidden thought process (which you cannot access) and its final response. Therefore, even without ê, ŷ still constitutes a full answer. "SFT w/ Complex CoT (x̂, ŷ)" is more akin to directly distilling o1's response rather than learning its thought process.
While reviewing Table 2, I noticed the notation for "SFT w/ Complex CoT (x̂, ŷ)". However, based on the context and the explanation in the paper, it seems that (x̂, ŷ) might actually refer to (ê, ŷ).
Could you please clarify if this is a typographical error or if I am misunderstanding the notation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: