Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Abi - Refactor / Coder #3031

Open
6 of 7 tasks
arboleya opened this issue Aug 25, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #3402 or #3085
Open
6 of 7 tasks

Abi - Refactor / Coder #3031

arboleya opened this issue Aug 25, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #3402 or #3085
Assignees
Labels
chore Issue is a chore feat Issue is a feature

Comments

@arboleya
Copy link
Member

arboleya commented Aug 25, 2024

Summary

  • Refactor and port abi-coder over
  • Plug existent strategies from newly created abi/parser's public interface

Final items

  • Optional parameters being passed
  • Implement the isReadOnly function
  • Implement the error handling (we already have a solution for this)
  • Integrate with the codebase (swap out the old Interface with the new Coder classes)
  • Update documentation
@arboleya arboleya added feat Issue is a feature chore Issue is a chore labels Aug 25, 2024
@arboleya arboleya added this to the Caterpillar v1 milestone Aug 25, 2024
@petertonysmith94 petertonysmith94 linked a pull request Sep 3, 2024 that will close this issue
4 tasks
@arboleya arboleya removed this from the Caterpillar v1 milestone Sep 7, 2024
@arboleya arboleya added the temp:notion label Sep 8, 2024 — with Linear
@arboleya arboleya added the temp-linear label Sep 8, 2024 — with Linear
@petertonysmith94 petertonysmith94 self-assigned this Sep 9, 2024
@nedsalk nedsalk self-assigned this Sep 12, 2024
@petertonysmith94 petertonysmith94 linked a pull request Nov 18, 2024 that will close this issue
13 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
chore Issue is a chore feat Issue is a feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants