You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I went into a rabbit hole after reading Surma's article "Is postMessage Slow?" and became curious to know the feasibility of using an ArrayBuffer with PROXX for performant postMessage() calls. My thoughts were to provide native JS property access while maintaining behavior of interface Cell to allow usage like: grid.cells[col][row].hasMine = true.
Do you think the approach below could provide benefits or is the current patchset implementation already performant enough? Instead of cluttering this thread with code, I wrote an independent POC to test the transferability of Cell states in a 40x40 grid. Start at CellGrid and Cell in branch: master...AnthumChris:arraybuffer-poc
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I went into a rabbit hole after reading Surma's article "Is postMessage Slow?" and became curious to know the feasibility of using an
ArrayBuffer
with PROXX for performantpostMessage()
calls. My thoughts were to provide native JS property access while maintaining behavior ofinterface Cell
to allow usage like:grid.cells[col][row].hasMine = true
.Do you think the approach below could provide benefits or is the current patchset implementation already performant enough? Instead of cluttering this thread with code, I wrote an independent POC to test the transferability of
Cell
states in a 40x40 grid. Start atCellGrid
andCell
in branch: master...AnthumChris:arraybuffer-pocThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: