-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 212
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Do we need to run the full test suite both with and without elasticsearch? #1035
Comments
This seems like a good chance to use tags and only run the tests we need to with elasticsearch, yes. |
I agree with @cesy: let's only run elasticsearch-specific tests with
elastic search on (and let's make sure there's a test for those post-commit
hooks).
|
👍 On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 1:16 PM pozorvlak [email protected] wrote:
|
Lets introduce tags to do this - https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-core/v/2-4/docs/command-line/tag-option |
So... 5028621 may have just reduced our flakey test behaviour significantly. |
I think what happened with my branches was master versus dev...maybe
…On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 7:30 PM CloCkWeRX ***@***.***> wrote:
So... 5028621
<5028621>
may have just reduced our flakey test behaviour significantly.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1035 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAYfcE4CN5EVI-v1X_0xc6QJqu-bhwPxks5rC3IagaJpZM4JrZS6>
.
|
We do
and
But only a small amount of tests around searches rely on elasticsearch. The rest are aftercommit hooks:
Should we:
This could shave a few minutes off builds by being more specific; as well as cut down on the number of times we have to re-run the whole suite.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: