You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I’ve produced an exhaustive restoration of a old film and want to showcase the restoration, both the main film and sources/segments/commentary as a single continuous viewing experience. A very controlled experience can be done on a single canvas (which has one timeline) but additional facilities would be required to facilitate this with multiple viewing windows.
Variation(s)
Also interested in exhibiting all the extra / surplus / repeat / unclean / cleaned / previously-digitised / re-coloured footage in a more interactive or curated viewing experience, alongside the restoration. In this case: content will overlap, repeat, over-run the timeline of the main film.
I have multiple recordings of multiple scores which I want to provide to the user.
Additional Background
BFI use case explored at BL 2017-02 workshop
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Synchronous playback that can extend before and after the "main" artefact. Might have top level canvas 8 hours, restoration canvas 6 hours, annotated starting 1 hour in to top.
Other content is annotated into first and last hour of top, with some overlap.
Potential for independent clocks in different manifests/canvases, with links to start them either automatically or manually
General requirement to link from part of timeline in A to part of timeline in B:
related ranges, with description/label/metadata etc. alternate perhaps?
viewer can then present UI to switch between current alternates, or 2-up them
possible transitivity confusions, may need more thinking
Might replace related with a more complex list of related items to be shown to the user when the user views the described resource, e.g.:
{
"type": "Range",
"links": [ {
"type": "Display?" // as:Link,
"label": "Alternate Camera Angle (View 6)",
"href": {"id": "http://example.org/.../range/7", "type": "Range"}
// why Range and not Canvas with time fragment?
}, // more links here ...
]
}
Consensus at meeting is that the idea of having multiple viewing windows tied to a single timeline with links and controls between them is a significant step up in complexity from our current use cases. Will defer this for now.
Description
I’ve produced an exhaustive restoration of a old film and want to showcase the restoration, both the main film and sources/segments/commentary as a single continuous viewing experience. A very controlled experience can be done on a single canvas (which has one timeline) but additional facilities would be required to facilitate this with multiple viewing windows.
Variation(s)
Also interested in exhibiting all the extra / surplus / repeat / unclean / cleaned / previously-digitised / re-coloured footage in a more interactive or curated viewing experience, alongside the restoration. In this case: content will overlap, repeat, over-run the timeline of the main film.
I have multiple recordings of multiple scores which I want to provide to the user.
Additional Background
BFI use case explored at BL 2017-02 workshop
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: