You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently I have 39GB of covers across 225,487 files in 9k series. These are all in one folder. Would it improve performance to have these files moved into smaller hashed folders?
As an example, just performing an ls (to /dev/null) gives the following results:
## In the covers folder
root@docker02:/local/kavita/covers# time ls >/dev/null
real 0m0.562s
user 0m0.269s
sys 0m0.289s
## In a much smaller folder... (parent directory)
root@docker02:/local/kavita# time ls >/dev/null
real 0m0.003s
user 0m0.003s
sys 0m0.000s
Idea Category
Performance Improvement
Duration of Using Kavita
2 weeks
Before submitting
I've already searched for existing ideas before posting.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Idea Description
Currently I have 39GB of covers across 225,487 files in 9k series. These are all in one folder. Would it improve performance to have these files moved into smaller hashed folders?
As an example, just performing an ls (to /dev/null) gives the following results:
Idea Category
Performance Improvement
Duration of Using Kavita
2 weeks
Before submitting
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions