You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
hello,your job is great。but I have some questions about the BGLOSS .
The first item is to make the prediction in the foreground area(distracting objects) near to 0, and the second one is to avoid learning a trivial solution (the paper says that we do not have the ground truth for the background area). however. can we directly use CELoss, like this nn.CELoss(output,1-label) to achieve BGLoss,?I think that in this way, I can force the foreground part to learn 0 and the background part to learn 1, so I don't need the second loss mentioned in the paper to avoid trivial solutions。
Did I understand wrong?thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Using nn.CELoss(output, 1-label) poses issues. It fails to consider other potential foreground objects within the background region, treating them all as background. Over multiple iterations, this approach disrupts the learning process.
hello,your job is great。but I have some questions about the BGLOSS .
The first item is to make the prediction in the foreground area(distracting objects) near to 0, and the second one is to avoid learning a trivial solution (the paper says that we do not have the ground truth for the background area). however. can we directly use CELoss, like this nn.CELoss(output,1-label) to achieve BGLoss,?I think that in this way, I can force the foreground part to learn 0 and the background part to learn 1, so I don't need the second loss mentioned in the paper to avoid trivial solutions。
Did I understand wrong?thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: