-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Tracking Issue: WhatWG issues opened by or tracked by Ladybird #771
Comments
@sideshowbarker This is what I was kind of thinking of for some sort of tracking list. Do you have any thoughts on how to organize/gather this information? This first cut was done with some manual |
Thanks for putting it together
As far as how to organize it, I think that looks great
So when I do that, I get a bigger list:
But I guess you already went through that whole longer list, to filter it down to just the issues we want to take action on? I addition to that, doing
…(though I realize the first ones are maybe ES spec bugs) …and that incidentally also shows: for catching WHATWG issues, I guess we need `git grep "whatwg/[a-z]+/issues" or such:
|
On the contrary, I wrote down the details for the first 5 I found and then got bored, hoping that "there's surely a way to script this" :) |
OK, if it seems like we have agreement on using the wiki for this, and you start a wiki page for this there — with a dump of the markdown for the subset already in the issue description — then, I can make time to add all the rest of the issues (following the format in the issue description). |
I've transposed this data so far into a markdown file in #893. It feels... incomplete, and hard to work with, but still better than a github issue. |
If a single document is awkward, what about just making each individual one its own GitHub issue, with a shared label? |
I think that could work fine too. I plan on helping follow up on the related issues upstream, helping them get attention upstream (e.g., by being on the WHATNOT calls to discuss them), and I don’t have any strong opinions about how the project manages the tracking for them here. |
Open Spec issues:
whatwg/html:
Removal of implied document Attempt to remove implied-document definition whatwg/html#4980
Algorithm: HostEnqueuePromiseJob
See:
ladybird/Userland/Libraries/LibWeb/Bindings/MainThreadVM.cpp
Lines 267 to 270 in 01ff3d4
UA style for
<br>
and<wbr>
UA style for <br> and <wbr> whatwg/html#2291Algorithm: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/rendering.html#phrasing-content-3
See:
ladybird/Userland/Libraries/LibWeb/CSS/Default.css
Lines 366 to 371 in 01ff3d4
ladybird/Userland/Libraries/LibWeb/CSS/StyleComputer.cpp
Lines 2352 to 2356 in 01ff3d4
Aborting document load impact on descendant navigables aborting a document load does not abort ongoing navigation of descendant navigables whatwg/html#9711
Algorithm: abort a document and its descendants
See:
ladybird/Userland/Libraries/LibWeb/DOM/Document.cpp
Lines 3323 to 3328 in 01ff3d4
whatwg/console
Algorithm: timeLog https://console.spec.whatwg.org/#timelog
See:
ladybird/Userland/Libraries/LibJS/Console.cpp
Lines 394 to 403 in 01ff3d4
Resolved Spec issues:
whatwg/html
Algorithm: destroy a document https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/document-lifecycle.html#destroy-a-document
See:
ladybird/Userland/Libraries/LibWeb/DOM/Document.cpp
Lines 3210 to 3212 in 01ff3d4
Resolved in Ladybird: NO
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: