Refactor cucumber specs

[coreypurcell]

the cukes are badly written (this is entirely my fault 👎 ) I want to see them written. If anyone has read the cucumber book you know what I want to see. Eventually I'll get around to this if no one else does.

[coreypurcell]

also add specs for anything that is a required feature if it is missing. I'd like to see this stuff enumerated in the 1st milestone.

[tbrooke]

I think this is important but I would like to see more emphasis on specs since I see spec as more related to the quality of the code - also and this may be late in the game but what about unit::test which I think is being incorporated in Rails 4 - which of course brings up the issue of Rails 4

(frankly I am confused on the Test Unit thing since I usually use rspec - but I understand that there has always been a test unit in Rails and Test::Unit is new and it is somewhat similar to rspec, but more concise)

[semmons99]

You're probably thinking MiniTest which is the new testing lib in 1.9.3 which replaces Test::Unit.

Included is MiniTest::Spec which similar to RSpec. Rails now uses MiniTest, but it's not really noticeable.

• shane

On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Tom Brooke wrote:

I think this is important but I would like to see more emphasis on specs since I see spec as more related to the quality of the code - also and this may be late in the game but what about unit::test which I think is being incorporated in Rails 4 - which of course brings up the issue of Rails 4
(frankly I am confused on the Test Unit thing since I usually use rspec - but I understand that there has always been a test unit in Rails and Test::Unit is new and it is somewhat similar to rspec, but more concise)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub (#77 (comment)).