Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Python 2.x and 3.x single-source version #25

Open
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Dec 4, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

Python 2.x and 3.x single-source version #25

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Dec 4, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

I made some changes and used six (https://pypi.python.org/pypi/six) to make 
this project work in python 2.x and 3.x with a single source (without 2to3).

Here is a summary of the changes:

https://github.com/concordusapps/wsgi-intercept/compare/29ee3e9117267c4bb7e5a2d5
3809a5d571c59e72...master

Notice that I just removed the stuff about long_description in the setup.py. 
That can be re-added nicer so that its not doing crazy things like parsing the 
AST just to get the description of the package.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by [email protected] on 2 Jul 2013 at 5:44

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I hadn't seen this before. Are you changes still in good shape. I was just 
going to the same thing but if yours is healthy then I'll try to merge things 
up to something proper that gets both versions of Python and covers the 
available libraries well.

Original comment by [email protected] on 30 Oct 2013 at 8:36

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I released a new version as 0.6.0 from 
https://github.com/cdent/python3-wsgi-intercept


Original comment by [email protected] on 7 Nov 2013 at 1:46

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

Apologies for getting back to you so late. Yeah; my fork was based on an older 
version.

Thanks for updating the library.

Original comment by [email protected] on 7 Nov 2013 at 4:13

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant