You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I attempted to use the video2world model to test the image-to-video generation feature. According to the project’s readme file, the model should support multiple resolutions and aspect ratios, including 1:1 (960x960), 4:3 (960x704), 3:4 (704x960), 16:9 (1280x704), and 9:16 (704x1280).
However, during the actual testing process, I found that only at the aspect ratio of 9:16 (704x1280) did the generated video quality appear relatively normal. At other ratios, the videos exhibited significant distortions and artifacts. I followed the scripts provided in the readme file precisely.
I would like to inquire if this situation is expected. If there were any errors in my operation or improper configuration, please advise on the correct usage. If not, is there a solution or planned fix for this issue?
Looking forward to your response, thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Could you point out where in Readme did you see that? So far I noticed that the only resolution that is accepted by video2world model is 1024x640. Anything else needed changes to the code and produced bad outputs
I attempted to use the video2world model to test the image-to-video generation feature. According to the project’s readme file, the model should support multiple resolutions and aspect ratios, including 1:1 (960x960), 4:3 (960x704), 3:4 (704x960), 16:9 (1280x704), and 9:16 (704x1280).
However, during the actual testing process, I found that only at the aspect ratio of 9:16 (704x1280) did the generated video quality appear relatively normal. At other ratios, the videos exhibited significant distortions and artifacts. I followed the scripts provided in the readme file precisely.
I would like to inquire if this situation is expected. If there were any errors in my operation or improper configuration, please advise on the correct usage. If not, is there a solution or planned fix for this issue?
Looking forward to your response, thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: