Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What are the criteria for the inclusion of a GFO extension? #47

Open
k00ni opened this issue Dec 3, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

What are the criteria for the inclusion of a GFO extension? #47

k00ni opened this issue Dec 3, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@k00ni
Copy link
Contributor

k00ni commented Dec 3, 2024

I would like to know at which point some GFO-related work is considered to be part of this repository (especially the OWL ontology) and when its more reasonable to keep both separate, but link to each other?

As an example here the work from Hanna Fiegenbaum: "Toward a formalization of artifacts in GFO" (PDF):

Fiegenbaum, Hanna. "Toward a formalization of artifacts in GFO." arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13452 (2024).

Her work is about an extension of material objects, called artifacts, which are intentionally made for a certain purpose. The following Github repository contains further content, such as axioms in a text file and a RDF/OWL:

https://github.com/hannafiegen/ArtifactGFO

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant