You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to know at which point some GFO-related work is considered to be part of this repository (especially the OWL ontology) and when its more reasonable to keep both separate, but link to each other?
As an example here the work from Hanna Fiegenbaum: "Toward a formalization of artifacts in GFO" (PDF):
Fiegenbaum, Hanna. "Toward a formalization of artifacts in GFO." arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13452 (2024).
Her work is about an extension of material objects, called artifacts, which are intentionally made for a certain purpose. The following Github repository contains further content, such as axioms in a text file and a RDF/OWL:
I would like to know at which point some GFO-related work is considered to be part of this repository (especially the OWL ontology) and when its more reasonable to keep both separate, but link to each other?
As an example here the work from Hanna Fiegenbaum: "Toward a formalization of artifacts in GFO" (PDF):
Her work is about an extension of material objects, called artifacts, which are intentionally made for a certain purpose. The following Github repository contains further content, such as axioms in a text file and a RDF/OWL:
https://github.com/hannafiegen/ArtifactGFO
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: