Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make pencil shuttle cmag only #27958

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pwbokie
Copy link
Contributor

@pwbokie pwbokie commented Jan 13, 2025

What Does This PR Do

Makes the pencil shuttle only able to be bought when the supply console has been cmagged.

Why It's Good For The Game

Ultimately this is an exercise for the reader.

Every pencil shuttle is chaotic LRP hell. Regardless of whether you think it's funny or not, the shuttle ruins the potential for RP, kills the natural resolution of antag/sec rivalries, and now with MILLA it takes one person leaving the door open on exit to kill everyone inside that wasn't prepared.

There is no good reason for buying the shuttle besides "trolololol".

Testing

Checked supply console shuttle options, no pencil, cmagged the console, bought it, waited 10 minutes because it was green alert and I didn't know how to set the shuttle time, got on the shuttle, rode it to CC, hated my life every second of the ride


Declaration

  • I confirm that I either do not require pre-approval for this PR, or I have obtained such approval and have included a screenshot to demonstrate this below.

Changelog

🆑
tweak: Secure Transport Vessel 5 (STV5) only purchasable when supply console is cmagged
/:cl:

@haydenredacted
Copy link
Contributor

Admin tab > Secrets > Show current traitors and objectives to change the shuttle time😎

@ParadiseSS13-Bot ParadiseSS13-Bot added the -Status: Awaiting type assignment This PR is waiting for its type to be assigned internally label Jan 13, 2025
@EmeraldCandy
Copy link
Contributor

maybe make it both emag AND cmag? a pencil shuttle could be genuinely easier to hijack and someone may wish to use that advantage

@pwbokie
Copy link
Contributor Author

pwbokie commented Jan 13, 2025

I made it cmag only because I want to see it less and assumed no practical use.

I did some quick polling in discord to see if people thought it was useful for hijack and no one seemed to think it was. But if it DOES make hijack easier, I agree that it should be accessible to emag too.

@EmeraldCandy
Copy link
Contributor

I made it cmag only because I want to see it less and assumed no practical use.

I did some quick polling in discord to see if people thought it was useful for hijack and no one seemed to think it was. But if it DOES make hijack easier, I agree that it should be accessible to emag too.

the way that I see it, is it basically shoves everyone into one tiny ass tuna can to bomb/set fire to/shoot down or even just to know you're in control. its easier to get people to not want to enter a small space than the entire shuttle where they think they can runa round and juke you. but thats my thoughts

Copy link
Contributor

@Miraviel Miraviel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

code is fine

@ParadiseSS13-Bot ParadiseSS13-Bot added -Status: Awaiting approval This PR is waiting for approval internally and removed -Status: Awaiting type assignment This PR is waiting for its type to be assigned internally labels Jan 13, 2025
@FunnyMan3595
Copy link
Contributor

I agree that something needs to be done with the pencil shuttle, but I don't think antag-locking it is the right way to go. Clown already has the snappop shuttle for funnies, and normal tots don't really need it. There needs to be a reason that you end up with it, a tradeoff that makes the station want (or be forced) to use it.

@Coolrune206
Copy link
Contributor

More CMag use is good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
-Status: Awaiting approval This PR is waiting for approval internally
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants