You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think we should add a comment about it in the tutorial, because:
Users may be confused that their circuit ran successfully, in spite of invalid angles therein.
To inform users about a modification of their circuit during transpilation.
But I also hesitate, having the concern that this will make the tutorial too detailed and complex. In particular note that the transformation applies to numeric angles but not to parametric ones.
I agree it would be good to mention that the qiskit-ibm-runtime transpiler plugin can handle the rzz angles when they are numeric, but I would rather let the docs team decide where that level of detail goes. Maybe it could be a footnote on the angle range given at the beginning of the document. Or maybe it could be a section near the end or in a separate linked document if there is another document on transpilation that is more appropriate.
Regarding this tutorial: https://github.com/Qiskit/documentation/blob/main/docs/guides/fractional-gates.ipynb
We recently added a new feature: transpilation of circuits with a backend that supports fractional gates will automatically transform the circuits, such that all
rzz
numeric angles are in the valid range of0 - pi/2
.I think we should add a comment about it in the tutorial, because:
But I also hesitate, having the concern that this will make the tutorial too detailed and complex. In particular note that the transformation applies to numeric angles but not to parametric ones.
Discussion a bit of discussion in Qiskit/qiskit-ibm-runtime#2043.
cc: @nkanazawa1989 @wshanks @kaelynj
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: