You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is it really best practice to "bend" the definitions of these (already very broad) categories?
Given the fact that there's also otherprops which presumably means "anything not fitting audience, platform, or product", shouldn't best practice be more like:
"Try to use these as consistently as possible and if audience, platform, or product don't fit, use otherprops or custom properties".
Otherwise the re-usability of that metadata will be affected, maybe even removed?
About the content of the attributes: should best practice be to have some kind of structured lists? E.g. products/platforms might include "family" of products/platforms, release date and/or version number; audience codes might be based on international standard codes e.g. ISO countries, IANA language codes etc. etc.?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
"you should not feel locked into using them specifically for audience, platform, or product filtering"
http://www.learningdita.com/topic/lc_conditions_filtering_attributes/
Is it really best practice to "bend" the definitions of these (already very broad) categories?
Given the fact that there's also
otherprops
which presumably means "anything not fitting audience, platform, or product", shouldn't best practice be more like:"Try to use these as consistently as possible and if audience, platform, or product don't fit, use
otherprops
or custom properties".Otherwise the re-usability of that metadata will be affected, maybe even removed?
About the content of the attributes: should best practice be to have some kind of structured lists? E.g. products/platforms might include "family" of products/platforms, release date and/or version number; audience codes might be based on international standard codes e.g. ISO countries, IANA language codes etc. etc.?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: