You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
Thanks for sharing the excellent work! I am reading the paper and have a question about the calibration mentioned in Equation (4). Since the approximated residual noise from Stage 1 is the $\bar{\epsilon}$ in Equation 1, then after calibration, why it should be adding $\frac{\lambda_2 \mu}{\lambda_1}$? I tried to derive the equation 4, and get the following equation:
$x = \lambda_1 y + (\bar{\epsilon}_{zeromean} + \mu)$
Hi,$\bar{\epsilon}$ in Equation 1, then after calibration, why it should be adding $\frac{\lambda_2 \mu}{\lambda_1}$ ? I tried to derive the equation 4, and get the following equation:
Thanks for sharing the excellent work! I am reading the paper and have a question about the calibration mentioned in Equation (4). Since the approximated residual noise from Stage 1 is the
I am wondering why the calibration is not adding$\frac{\mu}{\lambda_1}$ instead of $\frac{\lambda_2 \mu}{\lambda_1}$ .
Could you please help me figure out if there is anything wrong with my derivation? Thanks so much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: