You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For now I am treating the scan state in the same way as the track state: we wish to record data anytime the array is in either of these states. The scan state appears to refer to observations in which the array scans smoothly through changing RA and Dec values, as opposed to stop-and-stare observations at fixed RA and Dec (in the case of the track state).
As it stands, RA and DEC will update smoothly in the headers in the scan state. Are there any other considerations? Do we want to communicate to the processing nodes that the array is in the scan state or is the above sufficient?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For now I am treating the
scan
state in the same way as thetrack
state: we wish to record data anytime the array is in either of these states. Thescan
state appears to refer to observations in which the array scans smoothly through changing RA and Dec values, as opposed to stop-and-stare observations at fixed RA and Dec (in the case of thetrack
state).As it stands,
RA
andDEC
will update smoothly in the headers in thescan
state. Are there any other considerations? Do we want to communicate to the processing nodes that the array is in thescan
state or is the above sufficient?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: