You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At a high level, what do we want to consider for the internal score of an object? For the connection score? What exceptions do we want to make for strange objects (ie contributor, publication).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The main wrench in the works here is not all distinct tables should be considered connections. To give a list from clearest "internal seperate table" to "maybe?":
Seem likely to be more internal than connection:
Country
Org Alt Names
Org Type
role_type
publication_type
report_type
Less Certain Internal vs Connection:
File
GCMD Keywords
region
Array
Contributor
Org Relationships
Publication object
Maybe we should consider Connections only between certain high level types? i.e. Publication to Publication, Contributor to Contributor, and Contributor to Publication?
We concur the types and Country are internal. Same for org alt names.
Files
Since these are relatively flat objects with a exist / doesn't exist, we think this should go in internal.
For example, a URL and a file are about equivalent pronenance-wise, so we want to compare them apples to apples.
Array
Should be connection, not internal to Table, as Arrays have semantic connections available to them.
GCMD Keywords & Region
These help "connect" things, but not in a provenance way.
We think these should be scored internally and with connection.
Contributor Object
This shouldn't have an internal score, as it is the embodiment of the connection score for a person-org-publication
publication object
This shouldn't have an internal score, as it is the embodiment of the connection score between the publication entities and the things that can be connected to them.
organization relationship object
This shouldn't have an internal score, as it is the embodiment of the connection score between two organizations
What do we mean by connection?
whether or not a specific connection exists or not
the internal-score of a connection, and how that should affect our perception of the current object
connections: we should have a score per-type of connection (Images, References, Contributors)
optional connections: If an optional connection doesn't exist, that should not negatively affect the connection score. The Field would be left out. (I.e. If a chapter has no tables)
NB: Should we have the Figure store its number of panels?
Still to do: come up with the weights for the various connections
For 7/11.
At a high level, what do we want to consider for the internal score of an object? For the connection score? What exceptions do we want to make for strange objects (ie contributor, publication).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: