Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CORE] Improve AOB scan function logic by creating a function that accepts an options table #108

Open
gynt opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@gynt
Copy link
Collaborator

gynt commented May 14, 2024

This extended logic would slow it down with a factor of 1.72 (merging of options with defaults happened with merging two tables by top level keys only, 4 table entries). Calling a specific function is of course always faster than passing a options object as an argument. Tradeoffs tradeoffs tradeoffs

The benefit is that it is more clear about which kind of behavior to expect from scanForAOB versus AOBScan

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant