You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for your interest in writing a post! Please fill out the following information:
Your idea
Please describe the post you'd like to write in 2–4 sentences, and how that post would be a good match for The A11Y Project.
I'll review popular, javascript-based charting libraries. The review will cover what you need to do to enable accessibility while using these libraries. The intended audience is developers who are either currently using these libraries, or are evaluating different libraries before adopting one to their projects.
Outline (optional)
Optionally include a proposed outline for the post.
Accessibility considerations - what accessibility features are we looking for, and why we use them
1. Color blind
2. Keyboard-only
3. Low vision
4. Screen reader users
Grade A: Accessible by default
Grade B: Accessibility Switch - they come with the feature, but you have to know to turn them on
Grade C: Accessibility Plugins - you can get accessibility through 3rd party plugins
Grade D: Bring Your Own Accessibility - you have to build out your own customizations, but the library provides all the tools you need to do that
Grade F: Hacks/Inaccessible - you have to work around the library, if that's even an option
I will include links to documentation and/or codepens, so that readers can walk away knowing exactly what they need to make their charts accessible.
Additional information (optional)
Is there anything else we should know?
There is an item in the content style guide that I can only meet with creative interpretation:
Aim for brief, succinct post lengths.
The sections for each library will be quick and to-the-point. However, the whole post is probably going to be pretty long, because I'm evaluating a lot of libraries. I don't intend for many people to actually sit down and read everything, just to consolidate a lot of information in one place.
Thank you for your interest in writing a post! Please fill out the following information:
Your idea
I'll review popular, javascript-based charting libraries. The review will cover what you need to do to enable accessibility while using these libraries. The intended audience is developers who are either currently using these libraries, or are evaluating different libraries before adopting one to their projects.
Outline (optional)
1. Color blind
2. Keyboard-only
3. Low vision
4. Screen reader users
I will include links to documentation and/or codepens, so that readers can walk away knowing exactly what they need to make their charts accessible.
Additional information (optional)
There is an item in the content style guide that I can only meet with creative interpretation:
The sections for each library will be quick and to-the-point. However, the whole post is probably going to be pretty long, because I'm evaluating a lot of libraries. I don't intend for many people to actually sit down and read everything, just to consolidate a lot of information in one place.
Is that ok?
Terms
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: