You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If it is not too much work, please implement the following behaviour on ideas and accounts-pages:
when clicking on a religious group within the network, the religious group should move in the search bar (as if it was selected via the search bar), and the connections should appear (as if it was selected via the search bar)
when clicking on another religious group in the network, the religious group should move in the search bar next to the previous one, and the connections should be highlighted
when clicking on a previously selected religious group a second time, the religious group should be deleted from the search bar and the connections should disappear
We know that this follows a different logic than the rest of the map. We still think that it helps users to explore the map more intuitively.
But if this implementing this feature would mean making huge changes to the way things work now, we do not insist on this feature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If it is not too much work, please implement the following behaviour on ideas and accounts-pages:
when clicking on a religious group within the network, the religious group should move in the search bar (as if it was selected via the search bar), and the connections should appear (as if it was selected via the search bar)
when clicking on another religious group in the network, the religious group should move in the search bar next to the previous one, and the connections should be highlighted
when clicking on a previously selected religious group a second time, the religious group should be deleted from the search bar and the connections should disappear
We know that this follows a different logic than the rest of the map. We still think that it helps users to explore the map more intuitively.
But if this implementing this feature would mean making huge changes to the way things work now, we do not insist on this feature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: