Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Establish a pathway/workflow from collaboration data (Portal) to production (UTRANS/SGID) database #285

Closed
1 task done
gregbunce opened this issue Dec 11, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@gregbunce
Copy link

gregbunce commented Dec 11, 2023

Benefit

There's great benefit in collaborating with our stewards and users, however, under this workflow, we need a pathway (as we transition away from UTRANS) for these edits back to the projection database (SGID)

Acceptance Criteria

  • An established workflow for trails in which the collaboration edits in the Portal DB (from WFRC, etc) find their way back to SGID (open data, and open data)

Notes

Over time, this workflow may change especially once we deprecate UTRANS. For now, UTRANS needs to be in the mix, until we migrate the existing ArcMap tools/processes to Pro.

No response

Risks

No response

Issue Reference

refs #

@gregbunce gregbunce self-assigned this Dec 11, 2023
@gregbunce gregbunce changed the title Find a pathway from collaboration data (Portal) to production (UTRANS/SGID) database Establish a pathway/workflow from collaboration data (Portal) to production (UTRANS/SGID) database Dec 11, 2023
@steveoh
Copy link
Member

steveoh commented Dec 12, 2023

A modified farm from agol path could work here.

@gregbunce
Copy link
Author

gregbunce commented Mar 22, 2024

not a ton of progress was made on this feature in terms of roads data this quarter. i was able to establish a path forward for the trails data in Portal, and migrate that layer out of UTRANS however we are on hold until we work out the distributed collaboration synchronization issue that we are having with Portal. we are putting a ticket in with esri to resolve this. once this is worked out, we can move the trails data to Portal/Enterprise.
the roads are another story. that will take more time to Portal. that will hinge on the what we discover in in issue 286 (we'll be moving that issue to a new quarter)

@gregbunce
Copy link
Author

once we get a handle on the work that needs to be done that's outlined in #286 we'll be able to revisit this for the roads data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants