WFRC bikeways map - phase 2

[nathankota]

Benefit

• Provide the most up-to-date, mapped inventory of the multi-use pathway and on-street bike facilities, and proximate amenities/destinations (i.e. rec centers, school, grocery stores etc) and other context (AADT traffic volume and approximate speed limit -- or Level of Traffic Stress LoTS)
• Allow users to explore areas of interest to view bike-friendly transportation links, with full detail about the type of facility: class/subclass for on street bike facilities (e.g. buffered bike lane, sharrow route, etc), paved/non-paved for multi-use trails
• Allow users to use the interactive map to contribute geographic-specific edit suggestions to the map -- specifically new, updated, or missing links

Acceptance Criteria

• Feature Services wfrc-bike-map#5
• Figure out if this new derived dataset should be added to SGID
• Layout wfrc-bike-map#8
• GPS Location wfrc-bike-map#12

Notes

We have around 200 hours (PRJTASK0614068) (as of 12/23/24) on their general technical service contract left for this FY.

Risks

• Time among priorities
• Scope creep

[stdavis]

Questions:

• The current app is built using plain JS and Esri Calcite components to make it easier for WFRC devs to contribute to the project. It's been months and they haven't been able to do anything with it. We will likely be doing all of the work for this project ourselves. Is this still the best option?

Probably not. Steve and I decided that this project should be converted to our standard atlas template.

• Bert wants this app hosted at bikemap.utah.gov. Is this the best place for it? This likely means that we need to use the Utah Design System.
• Bert also wants us to host the data and services for this app which is derived from other SGID datasets. Is this a good candidate for the SGID? Do we want to take on the maintenance of the arcpy code that generates it?
• It appears that Bert has the interest from some folks from UDOT (Stephanie Tomlin [email protected], Jared Bowling [email protected], Neda Kiani [email protected]). Do we want to involve them?

[stdavis]

@leault Have you been able to make any headway with Bert about these questions above? Maybe @eneemann has thoughts about the question about us hosting the data? I don't feel like I can do much more work on this project until we sort out the direction for this app.

[leault]

I have a meeting with Bert on Friday at 11:15. Let me know if you want to join.

…

On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 11:19 AM Scott Davis ***@***.***> wrote: @leault <https://github.com/leault> Have you been able to make any headway with Bert about these questions above? Maybe @eneemann <https://github.com/eneemann> has thoughts about the question about us hosting the data? I don't feel like I can do much more work on this project until we sort out the direction for this app. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#371 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BK3H5GDBZC4W4IX32KQQJFD2L2FTPAVCNFSM6AAAAABFJQPSICVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMMBVGQ2DANZRGI> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[stdavis]

FY25 Q3 Sprint 2

• Laura, Erik, and I met with Bert last week. He is good with the new direction for the app. He cleared this DNS with UDOT: bikeways.utah.gov.
• We decided that UGRC would host the data to back this app in SGID on ArcGIS (not internal or open sgid) as well as wiring up the script via palletjack.