Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Typographic conventions: review document for consistency #341

Closed
AsamDiegoSanchez opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 2 comments · Fixed by #342
Closed

Typographic conventions: review document for consistency #341

AsamDiegoSanchez opened this issue Jan 30, 2025 · 2 comments · Fixed by #342
Assignees
Labels
isType:Editorial An issue that contains general structural and editorial changes
Milestone

Comments

@AsamDiegoSanchez
Copy link
Member

Describe the bug

I´ve found different words that are defined in the terms & definitions that should be in cursive according to the typographic conventions:

Image

Expected behavior

The defined terms in the the document should follow the typographic convention:

Image

@AsamDiegoSanchez AsamDiegoSanchez added the isType:Bug An issue that contains contradictions or errors in the standard. label Jan 30, 2025
@AsamDiegoSanchez AsamDiegoSanchez added this to the v1.0.0 milestone Jan 30, 2025
@AsamDiegoSanchez AsamDiegoSanchez added isType:Editorial An issue that contains general structural and editorial changes and removed isType:Bug An issue that contains contradictions or errors in the standard. labels Jan 30, 2025
@FKlopfer
Copy link
Collaborator

The "use case" chapter was still under revision when I applied the typographic conventions. I will update it.

@AsamDiegoSanchez
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks, I´m not sure if this typographic conventions also applies to the Foreword:

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
isType:Editorial An issue that contains general structural and editorial changes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants