Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make software citable #6

Open
arnikz opened this issue Nov 11, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Make software citable #6

arnikz opened this issue Nov 11, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@arnikz
Copy link

arnikz commented Nov 11, 2022

Get a DOI for each release.

Refs:
[1] https://citation-file-format.github.io
[2] https://docs.github.com/en/repositories/archiving-a-github-repository/referencing-and-citing-content

@mpfl
Copy link
Member

mpfl commented Nov 16, 2022

We weren't intending on having releases, per se. What is your use case for having versioned DOIs for the RAIDO software, versus a single DOI that refers to all versions of RAIDO/RAIDO the service?

@ardc-shorn
Copy link
Contributor

Note that we do plan to offer citability of raid data exports.
When a researcher wants to work with raids, it is expected that they will request a data export.
Then we'll (asynchronously) process that data export and upload it to Zenodo, which will assign a DOI for that specific data extract. Note that we've no previous experience integrating with Zenodo. This plan is predicated on the hope Zenodo will support and allow us to use it in this way.

@arnikz
Copy link
Author

arnikz commented Dec 8, 2022

That's great you're planning regular (RAiD) data releases. In the spirit of Open Science / FAIRness, one should embrace citations of all research assets including software (such as RAIDO).

@saross
Copy link

saross commented Mar 21, 2024

In another context I have been speaking with Aleem Uddin here at the ARDC about software citation, I'll ask him...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants