New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Verify usages of iterable vs. (iterable) sequence in spec #292

Open

tetromino opened this issue Dec 10, 2024 · 0 comments

Labels

P3 type: process

Collaborator

tetromino commented Dec 10, 2024

Quoting @brandjon at #290 (comment)

The "Sequence types" section seems to distinguish between "iterable" values and "iterable sequences", the difference being that the latter have a known length. But we're not consistent about that. For example, for loops are described as having an operand that is an "iterable value", but operate "for each element of the iterable's sequence" (strange use of possessive there - typo?).

tetromino added P3 type: process labels

tetromino mentioned this issue

Add a Starlark set data type #290

Merged

brandjon mentioned this issue

Equality and truthiness of string#elems #285

Open

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment