From 0157a7bbbb4c600c16754e6a2dcc2b5a82dc0bf0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Hodgson <189707+benhodgson87@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 18:04:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Update README.md

---
 README.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 9aaa186..95f035e 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # conventional-pull-request-action
 
-A Github Action that enforces the [conventional commit spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#specification) on pull request titles, whilst allowing for linting of scopes to be applied, for example to enforce the use of ticket numbers from issue trackers and project management tools. Although common opinion, and the spec, direct against doing this, it can be valuable in generating rich release notes for projects/organisations who do not find value in noun-based scopes. 
+A Github Action that enforces the [conventional commit spec](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/#specification) on pull request titles, whilst allowing for linting of scopes to be applied, for example to enforce the use of ticket numbers from issue trackers and project management tools. Although the spec generally directs against doing this, it can be valuable in generating rich release notes for projects/organisations who do not find value in noun-based scopes.
 
 Forked from, and heavily based on, Conde Nast's [conventional-pull-request-action](https://github.com/CondeNast/conventional-pull-request-action).