You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For instance, at the moment it is possible to have 'water_heat' and 'space_heat' as separate carriers or aggregated into one carrier ('heat'). The workflow currently works with all, but will break on anything other than 'heat' when filling templates in the euro-calliope submodule. This breaking change was introduced in one of the two latest commits, to push through a rapid update to how heat techs are represented.
Anyway, the method for handling these different carriers is quite messy and could do with cleaning in general.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For instance, at the moment it is possible to have 'water_heat' and 'space_heat' as separate carriers or aggregated into one carrier ('heat'). The workflow currently works with all, but will break on anything other than 'heat' when filling templates in the euro-calliope submodule. This breaking change was introduced in one of the two latest commits, to push through a rapid update to how heat techs are represented.
Anyway, the method for handling these different carriers is quite messy and could do with cleaning in general.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: