This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 2, 2024. It is now read-only.
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Create input files for TCI analysis (2/N) #60
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: Ryan Corbett <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Ryan Corbett <[email protected]>
…into achroni/explore-TMB-mut-script
Generate dndscv reference file
AntoniaChroni
force-pushed
the
achroni/TCI-create-input-files
branch
from
January 26, 2024 17:28
e92bf29
to
8f4dd8e
Compare
4 tasks
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose/implementation Section
What scientific question is your analysis addressing?
This notebook is for preparing input files for FastClone.
We are using only the non-synonymous mutations for clone inferences.
What was your approach?
What GitHub issue does your pull request address?
Closes #59
Directions for reviewers. Tell potential reviewers what kind of feedback you are soliciting.
Which areas should receive a particularly close look?
Is there anything that you want to discuss further?
Is the analysis in a mature enough form that the resulting figure(s) and/or table(s) are ready for review?
Results
What types of results are included (e.g., table, figure)?
What is your summary of the results?
Reproducibility Checklist
Documentation Checklist
README
and it is up to date.analyses/README.md
and the entry is up to date.