Replies: 1 comment
-
These compound relationships can be expressed using the ontology and a semantic graph, see the Procedure and Step classes for example. Naming the compound thing is another issue and probably out of scope. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
D3FEND is designed to be fairly atomic for countermeasures. This is good but I understand at times this may be difficult and resulted in some D3Codes that when decomposed can be looked at as being a combination of other D3Codes. This technically would result in that if xxx D3Code is met then automatically select yyy and zzz D3Codes.
If compound D3Codes are disallowed, there may be a formula-based approach that could be used within the descriptions to show relationships, which would be kind of really cool …basically search for a phrase and it will provide the related D3Codes or subcomponents possible and they select them.
A few examples:
a. Message Authentication (combination of Encrypted Traffic, Certificate-based Authentication, File Hashing)
b. MFA (combination of two or more authentication mechanisms).
_*** As an unrelated note...synonym style D3Codes such as Firmware Verification and System Firmware Verification that seem to be both File Hashing related. Should they be rolled into File Hashing.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions