You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Physical Machine Environment
CPU 40 core
Memory 128GiB
Disk 1.8T SAS(Not SSD)
Additional context
In response to this issue, where the IO footprint is high, but there are no obvious disk write and read operations, I understand that there are no more than a few reasons that can cause high IO for cached instances:
save alive bgsave operation is being carried out, resulting in the RDB file write disk is more centralized.
replica instance pulling bgsave files generated by the disk to cause a large number of read operations
log printing is more frequent, resulting in greater pressure on the SAS disk IO.
Frequent opening and closing of file handles by the dragonfly process
hard disk failure
According to the phenomenon, dragonfly opened 40 threads, almost full of all the cpu io processes.
It's true that I didn't specify the cpu resources that dragonfly can take up, but it shouldn't produce such a large IO footprint when there are no read/write accesses, I don't know if it's a bug or if I'm just lacking understanding of dragonfly's features.
Attached are the contents of my conf file,I wonder if there's a misconfiguration.
Describe the bug
Idle dragonfly with high physical machine IO footprint, but no high IO write and read operations.
Screenshots
sudo iotop -b -n 1 |head -n 50
pidstat -dl -p 25966
lsof -p 25966
Environment (please complete the following information):
Physical Machine Environment
CPU 40 core
Memory 128GiB
Disk 1.8T SAS(Not SSD)
Additional context
In response to this issue, where the IO footprint is high, but there are no obvious disk write and read operations, I understand that there are no more than a few reasons that can cause high IO for cached instances:
According to the phenomenon, dragonfly opened 40 threads, almost full of all the cpu io processes.
It's true that I didn't specify the cpu resources that dragonfly can take up, but it shouldn't produce such a large IO footprint when there are no read/write accesses, I don't know if it's a bug or if I'm just lacking understanding of dragonfly's features.
Looking forward to the answer, thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: