From 04359438977e037d716827132dc1e676a52dbd58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rafael Espindola Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 21:58:29 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Small change to avoid confusion on what "used by" means for a compiler. Patch by Jonathan Sauer. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk@161897 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- www/comparison.html | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/www/comparison.html b/www/comparison.html index 58c4b31e2f66..01b8aea06905 100644 --- a/www/comparison.html +++ b/www/comparison.html @@ -103,9 +103,9 @@

Clang vs GCC (GNU Compiler Collection)

sometimes acceptable, but are often confusing and it does not support expressive diagnostics. Clang also preserves typedefs in diagnostics consistently, showing macro expansions and many other features. -
  • GCC is licensed under the GPL license. clang uses a BSD license, which - allows it to be used by projects that do not themselves want to be - GPL.
  • +
  • GCC is licensed under the GPL license. + clang uses a BSD license, which allows it to be embedded in + software that is not GPL-licensed.
  • Clang inherits a number of features from its use of LLVM as a backend, including support for a bytecode representation for intermediate code, pluggable optimizers, link-time optimization support, Just-In-Time