Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

'glycan G00008' misclassified as phopholipid #4576

Open
ValWood opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

'glycan G00008' misclassified as phopholipid #4576

ValWood opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@ValWood
Copy link

ValWood commented Nov 12, 2024

Hi,

I am getting a GIc3Man9GIcNAc level classified as "increased phospholipid level' via CHEBI

but GIc3Man9GIcNAc is a dolichyl diphosphooligosaccharide rather than a phospholipid.

Screenshot 2024-11-12 at 15 46 41
@amalik01 amalik01 self-assigned this Nov 21, 2024
@amalik01
Copy link
Collaborator

amalik01 commented Nov 21, 2024

Hi @ValWood

I am trying to understand how your resource/database works. Where are you getting the GIc3Man9GIcNAc name from? I think you may be linking to the wrong ChEBI entry. The name you have mentioned is a polysaccharide whereas glycan G00008 (CHEBI:53019) has a dolichyl diphosphate group attached to the polysaccharide.

@ValWood
Copy link
Author

ValWood commented Nov 21, 2024

Glc₃Man₉GlcNAc₂ is a specific type of N-linked glycan. I was assuming that 'glycan G00008' was the CHEBI synonym for this since it has been used in our logical definition. This might be incorrect, I will dig deeper.

@ValWood
Copy link
Author

ValWood commented Nov 21, 2024

ChatGPT:
Yes, Glc₃Man₉GlcNAc₂ is sometimes referred to as Glycan G00008 in specific glycan databases, such as the GlyTouCan database, which provides unique accession numbers for glycans. This naming is database-specific and is used in bioinformatics contexts to uniquely identify glycan structures.

So it does seem that the positioning of 'Glycan G00008' in CHEBI is incorrect?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants