You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Inspecting dataframes always truncates the printed records without being affected of inspects :limit. While I can see why it's not following the default of 50, it would sometimes still be useful to see more than the currently hardcoded 5.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
First, you can use Explorer.DataFrame.print/2 which does accept a :limit argument. That might get you what you need in the short term.
Second, I was gonna say I worry about a :limit option for inspect because of how we currently format things. But we actually are smart enough to wrap longer columns across multiple lines. Example (see species):
The issue is the default value is too high. So we can’t respect it by default and then it is impossible for us to distinguish. Perhaps pointing to print is the best option.
Inspecting dataframes always truncates the printed records without being affected of inspects
:limit
. While I can see why it's not following the default of50
, it would sometimes still be useful to see more than the currently hardcoded 5.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: