Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

XEP-0440: SASL Channel-Binding Type Capability support #3921

Closed
Neustradamus opened this issue Jan 8, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

XEP-0440: SASL Channel-Binding Type Capability support #3921

Neustradamus opened this issue Jan 8, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
in backlog Community request added to backlog and waiting for implementation.

Comments

@Neustradamus
Copy link

Dear @esl team,

Can you add "XEP-0440: SASL Channel-Binding Type Capability" support?

Thanks in advance.

@chrzaszcz
Copy link
Member

Thanks for raising this issue. Currently we are only supporting the tls-unique channel binding type, so from my point of view the only benefit would be letting the client know about the support binding type, right? However, with #3721 we would need tls-exporter as well, so it might make more sense to explicitly tell the client what we support, even if there is a one-to-one mapping between binding types and TLS versions.

If there is any use case that you need the feature for, please let us know. It would help us understand the demand and thus prioritize it higher. Of course we are open for community contributions and feature sponsorship as well.

@pawlooss1 pawlooss1 added the in backlog Community request added to backlog and waiting for implementation. label Jun 28, 2023
@pawlooss1
Copy link
Member

Closing this issue for now due to lack of activity. We've created an internal backlog entry for this feature. Currently it is not on our roadmap but if the community demand increases we'll have a closer look at this. @Neustradamus if you would like to provide some additional info about use cases then feel free to reopen this issue or raise another one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
in backlog Community request added to backlog and waiting for implementation.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants