Replies: 1 comment
-
@Shekelme thank you for the input! It would be great to learn more about some of the issues that you had with Boost, and what type of end to end experience you would prefer when working with Lotus+Boost together. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi all!
I understand the utter futility of the question I am raising here, but I still want to try to do it. At least in order to say to myself, "I did everything I could," in any case.
Let's leave the Lotus-Market and develop it again. So that the Lotus software was a complete product, all parts of which were developed from the first line of code for mutual coordinated work.
As a participant in the Filecoin network from the very beginning of the testnet race, I never understood why it was necessary to put aside all the work that was invested in the Lotus-Market in order to debug the problems that were constantly detected in
boost
for last several months.As an SP, I really want to have as little body movements as possible and as much automatism as possible. So far, it seems to me personally that
boost
adds more problems than convenience. Is it really so necessary? Please change your mind. Perhaps I am not the only one who thinks so, but the others are just shy to raise this issue or do not want to waste their time on it.p.s. if you have nothing to say on it in a constructive way, please just skip post.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions