Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TASK [Clean up filesystem signature] fails #426

Open
smitthakkar96 opened this issue Aug 15, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

TASK [Clean up filesystem signature] fails #426

smitthakkar96 opened this issue Aug 15, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@smitthakkar96
Copy link
Member

While I try to run 2x2-volume-create.conf present in examples it runs into error and below is traceback.

Traceback

TASK [Clean up filesystem signature] ***********************************************************************************************************************************************************************
fatal: [165.227.80.95]: FAILED! => {"failed": true, "msg": "The conditional check 'wipefs == 'yes' and item is defined' failed. The error was: error while evaluating conditional (wipefs == 'yes' and item is defined): 'wipefs' is undefined\n\nThe error appears to have been in '/tmp/tmpsQDYtQ/pvcreate.yml': line 9, column 5, but may\nbe elsewhere in the file depending on the exact syntax problem.\n\nThe offending line appears to be:\n\n  # present.\n  - name: Clean up filesystem signature\n    ^ here\n"}
...ignoring
fatal: [192.241.151.186]: FAILED! => {"failed": true, "msg": "The conditional check 'wipefs == 'yes' and item is defined' failed. The error was: error while evaluating conditional (wipefs == 'yes' and item is defined): 'wipefs' is undefined\n\nThe error appears to have been in '/tmp/tmpsQDYtQ/pvcreate.yml': line 9, column 5, but may\nbe elsewhere in the file depending on the exact syntax problem.\n\nThe offending line appears to be:\n\n  # present.\n  - name: Clean up filesystem signature\n    ^ here\n"}
...ignoring
fatal: [67.205.136.191]: FAILED! => {"failed": true, "msg": "The conditional check 'wipefs == 'yes' and item is defined' failed. The error was: error while evaluating conditional (wipefs == 'yes' and item is defined): 'wipefs' is undefined\n\nThe error appears to have been in '/tmp/tmpsQDYtQ/pvcreate.yml': line 9, column 5, but may\nbe elsewhere in the file depending on the exact syntax problem.\n\nThe offending line appears to be:\n\n  # present.\n  - name: Clean up filesystem signature\n    ^ here\n"}
...ignoring
fatal: [198.199.90.206]: FAILED! => {"failed": true, "msg": "The conditional check 'wipefs == 'yes' and item is defined' failed. The error was: error while evaluating conditional (wipefs == 'yes' and item is defined): 'wipefs' is undefined\n\nThe error appears to have been in '/tmp/tmpsQDYtQ/pvcreate.yml': line 9, column 5, but may\nbe elsewhere in the file depending on the exact syntax problem.\n\nThe offending line appears to be:\n\n  # present.\n  - name: Clean up filesystem signature\n    ^ here\n"}
...ignoring
fatal: [192.81.208.34]: FAILED! => {"failed": true, "msg": "The conditional check 'wipefs == 'yes' and item is defined' failed. The error was: error while evaluating conditional (wipefs == 'yes' and item is defined): 'wipefs' is undefined\n\nThe error appears to have been in '/tmp/tmpsQDYtQ/pvcreate.yml': line 9, column 5, but may\nbe elsewhere in the file depending on the exact syntax problem.\n\nThe offending line appears to be:\n\n  # present.\n  - name: Clean up filesystem signature\n    ^ here\n"}
...ignoring 
@devyanikota
Copy link
Contributor

@smitthakkar96 hello. Can you tell us which version of gdeploy have you installed.

@smitthakkar96
Copy link
Member Author

gdeploy 2.0

@sac
Copy link
Member

sac commented Aug 17, 2017

@smitthakkar96 I just tested it works fine for me.
[sac@dhcp35-44 tmpMkiHFL]$ rpm -qa | grep gdeploy
gdeploy-doc-2.0.2-13.noarch
gdeploy-2.0.2-13.noarch

Can you share your config file? I would like to take a look. Or maybe use the exact config file.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants