Alternative levels to encode multiSend in Safe -> Roles -> Safe
routes
#5
Labels
enhancement
New feature or request
Safe -> Roles -> Safe
routes
#5
Given a route
Safe -member-> Roles -enabled-> Safe
and an array of transactionsT
you can encode it as either:execThroughRole(multiSend(T))
ormultiSend(for t in T: execThroughRole(t))
So far we're generally encoding the former option, but there might be advantages to the latter alternative: It does not require unwrapping on the Roles mod, sparing the user from configuring a multisend unwrapper
Would also make sense to benchmark this from a gas cost perspective.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: