You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 9, 2024. It is now read-only.
What are the conceptual and technical differences between Slot Attention and Transformer modules, particularly in terms of their architectural components like the use of a GRU cell in Slot Attention versus the absence of such in Transformers? How might these differences influence the outcomes and interpretations of results when applied to tasks such as object-centric learning? Would substituting Slot Attention with a Transformer module in a given architecture yield comparable performance, or are there theoretical considerations that would necessitate adjustments to maintain functionality?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Question edited for clarity:
What are the conceptual and technical differences between Slot Attention and Transformer modules, particularly in terms of their architectural components like the use of a GRU cell in Slot Attention versus the absence of such in Transformers? How might these differences influence the outcomes and interpretations of results when applied to tasks such as object-centric learning? Would substituting Slot Attention with a Transformer module in a given architecture yield comparable performance, or are there theoretical considerations that would necessitate adjustments to maintain functionality?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: