You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Your current Server version located at the bottom of any Hashtopolis webpage: v12
Current Client version: v6
Your current Hashcat version: 5.1
Starting to work on bigger cracking projects within Hashtopolis and currently shift around and jumping priories works very well for shifting other teammates work around.
We believe it may be beneficial to add a function to display an estimated time remaining on the Task/Supertask. We currently do this math by hand but for our bigger hash runs lasting over a month, being able to have a quick glance and see the time still diminishing would be a plus.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm not sure what you mean exactly here. There is an approximate estimated time of completion shown on the task detail page when it is running (based on how fast it processed the progress until that time). Is this not what you need or is it not enough?
With release 0.13.0, when you edit a supertask you can run an estimate of the runtime of a supertask. But I get this issue is also at run time and not only during planning.
zyronix
changed the title
Enhancement Request: Estimated Time of Completion (ETC)
[ENHANCEMENT] SuperTask Estimated Time of Completion (ETC)
Jun 16, 2023
Your current Server version located at the bottom of any Hashtopolis webpage: v12
Current Client version: v6
Your current Hashcat version: 5.1
Starting to work on bigger cracking projects within Hashtopolis and currently shift around and jumping priories works very well for shifting other teammates work around.
We believe it may be beneficial to add a function to display an estimated time remaining on the Task/Supertask. We currently do this math by hand but for our bigger hash runs lasting over a month, being able to have a quick glance and see the time still diminishing would be a plus.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: