Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support LoadBalancerClass in Services #832

Open
EternalDeiwos opened this issue Dec 21, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Support LoadBalancerClass in Services #832

EternalDeiwos opened this issue Dec 21, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@EternalDeiwos
Copy link

TL;DR

Following #338; figured posting a new issue was better than thread-necro.

It would be very helpful for CCM to have a loadBalancerClass defined, because I am pretty sure that every other LB implementation out there is going to assume they are the "default". At least Cilium does.

Picking between load balancers is done with the .spec.loadBalancerClass field. When LB IPAM is enabled it allocates and assigns IPs for services with no load balancer class set.

cc @apricote

Expected behavior

I should be able to specify a value for loadBalancerClass to exclude other load balancer implementations.

@EternalDeiwos EternalDeiwos added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant