Some RFCs apparently doesn’t exist in this source

[strogonoff]

These are absent, but maybe they shouldn’t be?

• RFC4399
• RFC0710
• RFC0275
• RFC3999
• RFC0248
• RFC0260
• RFC6000
• Possibly others

Source: they exist under /public/rfc/bibxml/.

Worst case, up to 185 bibliographic items are missing.

cc @andrew2net @ronaldtse

[ronaldtse]

I've set up relaton/relaton-ietf#89 to deal with this.

[ronaldtse]

From @andrew2net relaton/relaton-ietf#89 (comment)

The RFC Editor site says these identifiers are not published.

[ronaldtse]

@strogonoff can you help post the full list of identifiers that are not available?

Right now the entries look like this, e.g. RFC 6000:
http://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml-rfcs/reference.RFC.6000.xml

<reference anchor="RFC6000" target="https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6000">
<front>
  <title>Not Issued</title>
  <author initials="" surname="" fullname="">
    <organization/>
    </author>
  </front>
  <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="6000"/>
</reference>

[rjsparks]

Is there still anything to be done with this issue, or can it be closed?