You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A feature difference between scholar and fatcat is that fatcat displays non-IA preservation status. As a first step towards supporting this in scholar, we could/should show "Keepers" preservation status for individual works.
This could include the specific keepers (LOCKSS, Portico, Hathitrust, etc), or just indicate "in at least one keeper". It could link directly to the keeper's registry on issn.org (eg, https://keepers.issn.org/?q=api/search&search[]=MUST=allissn=0958-1596&search[]=MUST_EXIST=keepers), or to fatcat, or just be a visual label (like the other tags are currently).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A feature difference between scholar and fatcat is that fatcat displays non-IA preservation status. As a first step towards supporting this in scholar, we could/should show "Keepers" preservation status for individual works.
This could include the specific keepers (LOCKSS, Portico, Hathitrust, etc), or just indicate "in at least one keeper". It could link directly to the keeper's registry on issn.org (eg, https://keepers.issn.org/?q=api/search&search[]=MUST=allissn=0958-1596&search[]=MUST_EXIST=keepers), or to fatcat, or just be a visual label (like the other tags are currently).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: